This guide is currently under development, and I greatly welcome any suggestions or feedback or at reaper.gitbook@gmail.com

Testing Methodologies

Professional penetration testing follows established methodologies to ensure systematic and comprehensive assessments. Here are three proven approaches:

OWASP Testing Guide

The OWASP Testing Guide provides a comprehensive framework specifically designed for web application security testing. It offers detailed guidance on testing procedures and techniques.

Key Phases:

  • Information Gathering and Reconnaissance

  • Configuration and Deployment Management Testing

  • Identity Management Testing

  • Authentication and Session Management Testing

  • Authorization Testing

  • Data Validation Testing

  • Error Handling and Logging Testing

  • Cryptography Testing

  • Business Logic Testing

  • Client-Side Testing

Strengths: Detailed technical guidance, regularly updated, free and open-source, widely adopted for web applications.

NIST SP 800-115

The National Institute of Standards and Technology provides a federal standard for information security testing and assessment, offering a structured approach to security evaluations.

Key Phases:

  1. Planning: Define scope, rules of engagement, and testing approach

  2. Discovery: Gather information about the target environment

  3. Attack: Attempt to exploit identified vulnerabilities

  4. Reporting: Document findings and provide remediation recommendations

Strengths: Government-approved methodology, comprehensive coverage, strong emphasis on planning and documentation.

PTES (Penetration Testing Execution Standard)

PTES provides a complete framework covering all aspects of a penetration test, from initial planning through final reporting.

Key Phases:

  1. Pre-engagement Interactions: Scope definition and legal agreements

  2. Intelligence Gathering: Passive and active reconnaissance

  3. Threat Modeling: Identify potential attack vectors

  4. Vulnerability Analysis: Discover and validate security weaknesses

  5. Exploitation: Attempt to exploit vulnerabilities

  6. Post Exploitation: Determine impact and maintain access

  7. Reporting: Communicate findings and recommendations

Strengths: Comprehensive coverage, detailed technical guidelines, industry collaboration, practical focus.

Last updated

Was this helpful?